Sequential assessment of alternative sites debated

A claim made by an appellant in respect of a site in north Yorkshire that the council had given misleading advice in respect of the need to assess alternative sites with a lower risk of flooding was rejected by an inspector who decided that they had followed national advice.

Subscriber content. To view it please sign in below or  subscribe

Or log in to DCP Online or Compass Online

Please enter your details

Forgotten Password?

Having trouble signing in?

Contact Customer Support at
or call 0208 267 4025, or refer to our answers to frequently asked questions.

Subscribe to Mineral Planning or Waste Planning

Subscribe Now

or Sign up for a free trial